Re: [PATCH v4 3/4] locking/qspinlock: Add ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32
From: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Date: 2021-03-31 15:11:58
Also in:
linux-riscv, lkml
Hi Stafford, How do think add ARCH_USE_QUEUED_SPINLOCKS_XCHG32 in openrisc? https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/1617201040-83905-7-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org/T/#u (local) On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 8:31 PM Stafford Horne [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 09:23:27AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:quoted
On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 12:35 AM Stafford Horne [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
I just want to chime in here, there may be a better spot in the thread to mention this but, for OpenRISC I did implement some generic 8/16-bit xchg code which I have on my todo list somwhere to replace the other generic implementations like that in mips. arch/openrisc/include/asm/cmpxchg.h The idea would be that architectures just implement these methods: long cmpxchg_u32(*ptr,old,new) long xchg_u32(*ptr,val) Then the rest of the generic header would implement cmpxchg.I like the idea of generalizing it a little further. I'd suggest staying a little closer to the existing naming here though, as we already have cmpxchg() for the type-agnostic version, and cmpxchg64() for the fixed-length 64-bit version.OK.quoted
I think a nice interface between architecture-specific and architecture independent code would be to have architectures provide arch_cmpxchg32()/arch_xchg32() as the most basic version, as well as arch_cmpxchg8()/arch_cmpxchg16()/arch_xchg8()/arch_xchg16() if they have instructions for those.Thanks for the name suggestions, it makes it easier for me.quoted
The common code can then build cmpxchg16()/xchg16() on top of either the 16-bit or the 32-bit primitives, and build the cmpxchg()/xchg() wrapper around those (or alternatively we can decide to have them only deal with fixed-32-bit and long/pointer sized atomics).Yeah, that was the idea. -Stafford
-- Best Regards Guo Ren ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/