Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1

From
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Date
2015-02-26 20:52:23
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Serge E. Hallyn, 2015-02-26
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:34 PM, Serge E. Hallyn [off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 02:13:00PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
quoted
Andrew Morgan was against that.  What if we changed

pE' = pP' & (fE | pA)

to

    if (pA)
            pE' = pP' & fE
    else
            pE' = pP'
Same problem as before. The ambient bits will not be set in pE'.
And what if I weren't scatterbrained and we did

        if (pA)
                pE' = pP'
        else
                pE' = pP' & fE

All pP' bits would be set in pE'.
That seems reasonable to me, except for my paranoia:

What if there's a program with CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE in fP and fE set to
the empty set (i.e. the magic effective bit cleared), and the program
relies on that.  A malicious user has CAP_NET_BIND and sets pA =
CAP_NET_BIND.  Boom!

If we changed that to if (pA') and zeroed pA if fP is non-empty then
this problem goes away.

--Andy

-- 
Andy Lutomirski
AMA Capital Management, LLC
Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 4 authors, last reply 2015-02-26
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help