Re: [PATCH] capabilities: Ambient capability set V1

From
Christoph Lameter <hidden>
Date
2015-02-24 15:48:54
Also in
lkml
Reply to
Andy Lutomirski, 2015-02-23
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Feb 23, 2015 8:41 AM, "Christoph Lameter" [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, 23 Feb 2015, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
quoted
If you set ambient caps and then run a setuid program (without
no_new_privs), then the ambient set *must* be cleared by the kernel
because that's what the setuid program expects.  Yes, the whole
Why would a setuid program expect that? I'd say we expect the ambient set
to remain in effect. What would break if the ambient set would stay
active?
On a total guess: exim, sendmail, sudo, Apache suexec, etc.  Basically
anything that expects setresuid(nonzero values); execve to drop caps.
Really? We have been running these things for years with the approach of
leaving these caps active.
Thread (42 messages) 42 messages, 4 authors, last reply 2015-02-26
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help