On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
quoted
Well doing that breaks su.
Don't what exactly? You're saying that doing
pI' = pI
pA' = pA (pA is ambient)
pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA))
pE' = pP' & (fE | pA)
stopped su from having CAP_SETGID while
pI' = pI
pA' = pA (pA is ambient)
pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA))
pE' = pP' & fE
worked? I'll hope you're saying both "fail", in which case
fE does not exist in cpu_vfs_cap_data. We only get fI and fP. Why in the
world does setcap allow setting fE?
V1 does not use fE. In my newer attempt, I seemed to have worked
with zeroed field that I assumed was filled in.
I will just do
pE' = pP'
Ok?