On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 02:25:19PM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Serge Hallyn wrote:
quoted
Yeah we could make this
Well doing that breaks su.
Don't what exactly? You're saying that doing
pI' = pI
pA' = pA (pA is ambient)
pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA))
pE' = pP' & (fE | pA)
stopped su from having CAP_SETGID while
pI' = pI
pA' = pA (pA is ambient)
pP' = (X & fP) | (pI & (fI | pA))
pE' = pP' & fE
worked? I'll hope you're saying both "fail", in which case
Its best to leave perm bits untouched.
christoph@fujitsu-haswell:~$ su
setgid: Operation not permitted
Did you initialize by running a program to fill your pI?
-serge