Re: IB/core: Fine-tuning for ib_is_udata_cleared()
From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-21 20:15:58
Also in:
linux-rdma, lkml
From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-21 20:15:58
Also in:
linux-rdma, lkml
quoted
quoted
Don't introduce a defect in patch 1 and correct that introduced defect in patch 2.Which detail do you not like here?See above.
This feedback is not clearer. I find that the two update steps should work in principle, shouldn't they? I guess that we have got different preferences for the shown patch granularity. Another update variant can follow a bit later with the changes squashed together. Regards, Markus