Thread (1333 messages) 1333 messages, 109 authors, 2024-01-05

Re: IB/core: Fine-tuning for ib_is_udata_cleared()

From: SF Markus Elfring <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-21 20:15:58
Also in: linux-rdma, lkml

quoted
quoted
Don't introduce a defect in patch 1 and correct
that introduced defect in patch 2.
Which detail do you not like here?
See above.
This feedback is not clearer.

I find that the two update steps should work in principle,
shouldn't they?

I guess that we have got different preferences for the shown
patch granularity. Another update variant can follow a bit later
with the changes squashed together.

Regards,
Markus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help