Thread (235 messages) flat view 235 messages, 5 authors, 2021-09-02

Re: [PATCH v2 14/24] pack-bitmap: write multi-pack bitmaps

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-12 20:00:39

On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 03:33:18PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
quoted
quoted
It's only necessary now (at least for determining a preferred pack if
the caller didn't specify one with `--preferred-pack`) because we care
about reading the `num_objects` field, which the index must be loaded
for.
I guess I'm a little confused about "now" in your sentence. I understand
that it's not necessary before your series to have loaded all of the
index files ahead of time. But didn't we need to do so in v2 of your
series, which has the preferred-pack logic?

If so, then was the v2 version buggy, since it only called
prepare_midx_pack() and not open_pack_index()? And then v3 is fixing
that? Or is something else opening the pack index for us?
In earlier versions of this series, I don't think we needed to have the
indexes loaded by this point, since (before v3) we didn't care about
ignoring the empty packs when finding a default preferred-pack.

But now we do, and so we need to call open_pack_index() ourselves.
Confusingly, we only need to do that on packs that *are* included in the
MIDX, since prepare_midx_pack() doesn't do it for us, but
add_pack_to_midx() does.
Ah, that was the part I was missing: the default preferred-pack stuff is
only in v3. That makes sense.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help