Re: [PATCH v2 14/24] pack-bitmap: write multi-pack bitmaps
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2021-08-12 20:00:39
On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 03:33:18PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
quoted
quoted
It's only necessary now (at least for determining a preferred pack if the caller didn't specify one with `--preferred-pack`) because we care about reading the `num_objects` field, which the index must be loaded for.I guess I'm a little confused about "now" in your sentence. I understand that it's not necessary before your series to have loaded all of the index files ahead of time. But didn't we need to do so in v2 of your series, which has the preferred-pack logic? If so, then was the v2 version buggy, since it only called prepare_midx_pack() and not open_pack_index()? And then v3 is fixing that? Or is something else opening the pack index for us?In earlier versions of this series, I don't think we needed to have the indexes loaded by this point, since (before v3) we didn't care about ignoring the empty packs when finding a default preferred-pack. But now we do, and so we need to call open_pack_index() ourselves. Confusingly, we only need to do that on packs that *are* included in the MIDX, since prepare_midx_pack() doesn't do it for us, but add_pack_to_midx() does.
Ah, that was the part I was missing: the default preferred-pack stuff is only in v3. That makes sense. -Peff