Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jul 2021, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Jul 01 2021, Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget wrote:
quoted
quoted
@@ -2793,6 +2803,9 @@ GIT-BUILD-OPTIONS: FORCE
@echo PAGER_ENV=\''$(subst ','\'',$(subst ','\'',$(PAGER_ENV)))'\' >>$@+
@echo DC_SHA1=\''$(subst ','\'',$(subst ','\'',$(DC_SHA1)))'\' >>$@+
@echo X=\'$(X)\' >>$@+
+ifdef FSMONITOR_DAEMON_BACKEND
+ @echo FSMONITOR_DAEMON_BACKEND=\''$(subst ','\'',$(subst ','\'',$(FSMONITOR_DAEMON_BACKEND)))'\' >>$@+
+endif
Why put this in an ifdef?
Why not? What benefit does this question bring to improving this patch
series?
This is a common debate tactic known as "shifting the burden of proof".
Ævar does not need to prove that your patch is undesirable, *you* have
to prove that it is desirable.
You have the burden of proof, so you should answer the question.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/logicalfallacies/Shifting-of-the-Burden-of-Proof
--
Felipe Contreras