Re: [PATCH 18/23] fsmonitor--daemon:: introduce client delay for testing

On 4/1/2021 11:41 AM, Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget wrote:

From: Jeff Hostetler <redacted>

Define GIT_TEST_FSMONITOR_CLIENT_DELAY as a millisecond delay.

This is a second delay introduced in this feature, but the units
are different. Could we put a unit in the name? Perhaps a "_MS"
suffix.

Introduce an artificial delay when processing client requests.
This make the CI/PR test suite a little more stable and avoids
the need to load up test scripts with sleep statements to avoid
racy failures.  This was mostly seen on 1 or 2 core CI build
machines where the test script would create a file and quickly
try to confirm that the daemon had seen it *before* the daemon
had received the kernel event and causing a test failure.

Isn't the cookie file supposed to prevent this from happening?

Yes, our test suite interacts with the filesystem and Git commands
more quickly than a human user would, but Git is used all the time
by scripts or build machines to quickly process data. The FS
Monitor feature should be robust to such a situation.

I feel that as currently described, this patch is only hiding a
bug that shows up during heavy use.

Perhaps the test failures are limited to a small number of
specific tests that are checking the FS Monitor daemon in a
non-standard way, especially in a way that circumvents the
cookie file. In this case, I'd like to see _in this patch_ how
the environment variable is used in the test suite.

I understand that it is difficult to simultaneously build a new
feature like this in small increments, but the biggest issue I
have with the series' organization so far is that we are 18
patches deep and I still haven't seen a single test. This is
a case where I think this only serves the purpose of the test
suite, so it would be good to delay until only seeing its value
in a test script.

Looking ahead, I see that you insert it as a blanket statement
in the t7527 test script, which seems like it has potential to
hide bugs instead of being an isolated cover for a specific
interaction.

As for the code, it all looks correct. However, please update
t/README with a description of the new GIT_TEST_* variable.

Thanks,
-Stolee