Thread (214 messages) flat view 214 messages, 10 authors, 2021-07-26

Re: [PATCH 21/23] t7527: create test for fsmonitor--daemon

From: Derrick Stolee <hidden>
Date: 2021-04-27 15:41:16

On 4/1/2021 11:41 AM, Jeff Hostetler via GitGitGadget wrote:
From: Jeff Hostetler <redacted>
It might be nice to summarize the testing strategy here. Are these just
the basics? Is this a full list of every conceivable client/server
interaction? Do some platforms need special tests?
+# Ask the fsmonitor daemon to insert a little delay before responding to
+# client commands like `git status` and `git fsmonitor--daemon --query` to
+# allow recent filesystem events to be received by the daemon.  This helps
+# the CI/PR builds be more stable.
+#
+# An arbitrary millisecond value.
+#
+GIT_TEST_FSMONITOR_CLIENT_DELAY=1000
+export GIT_TEST_FSMONITOR_CLIENT_DELAY
As I mentioned before, this seems like it is hiding a bug, especially
because of a full second delay. But even a 1 millisecond delay seems
like it is incorrect to assume this feature works correctly if the
test requires this delay.

If there is a specific interaction that has issues, then it might be
valid to insert this delay in a specific test or two.
+git version --build-options | grep "feature:" | grep "fsmonitor--daemon" || {
+	skip_all="The built-in FSMonitor is not supported on this platform"
+	test_done
+}
I see some precedent of this pattern, but it might be nice to instead
register a prereq and then test for the prereq here in the test script.
+kill_repo () {
Perhaps "kill_repo_daemon" might be more specific?
+	r=$1
+	git -C $r fsmonitor--daemon --stop >/dev/null 2>/dev/null
+	rm -rf $1
+	return 0
+}
+
+start_daemon () {
+	case "$#" in
+		1) r="-C $1";;
+		*) r="";
+	esac
+
+	git $r fsmonitor--daemon --start || return $?
+	git $r fsmonitor--daemon --is-running || return $?
Perhaps add 'test_when_finished kill_repo "$r"' as a line here so
consumers don't need to do it themselves.
+	return 0
+}
+
+test_expect_success 'explicit daemon start and stop' '
+	test_when_finished "kill_repo test_explicit" &&
+
+	git init test_explicit &&
+	start_daemon test_explicit &&
+
+	git -C test_explicit fsmonitor--daemon --stop &&
+	test_must_fail git -C test_explicit fsmonitor--daemon --is-running
+'
This is an example of a test that could have been created as early as
patch 09/23.
+test_expect_success 'implicit daemon start' '
+	test_when_finished "kill_repo test_implicit" &&
+
+	git init test_implicit &&
+	test_must_fail git -C test_implicit fsmonitor--daemon --is-running &&
+
+	# query will implicitly start the daemon.
+	#
+	# for test-script simplicity, we send a V1 timestamp rather than
+	# a V2 token.  either way, the daemon response to any query contains
+	# a new V2 token.  (the daemon may complain that we sent a V1 request,
+	# but this test case is only concerned with whether the daemon was
+	# implicitly started.)
+
+	GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$PWD/.git/trace" \
+		git -C test_implicit fsmonitor--daemon --query 0 >actual &&
+	nul_to_q <actual >actual.filtered &&
+	grep "builtin:" actual.filtered &&
+
+	# confirm that a daemon was started in the background.
+	#
+	# since the mechanism for starting the background daemon is platform
+	# dependent, just confirm that the foreground command received a
+	# response from the daemon.
+
+	grep :\"query/response-length\" .git/trace &&
+
+	git -C test_implicit fsmonitor--daemon --is-running &&
+	git -C test_implicit fsmonitor--daemon --stop &&
+	test_must_fail git -C test_implicit fsmonitor--daemon --is-running
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'implicit daemon stop (delete .git)' '
+	test_when_finished "kill_repo test_implicit_1" &&
+
+	git init test_implicit_1 &&
+
+	start_daemon test_implicit_1 &&
+
+	# deleting the .git directory will implicitly stop the daemon.
+	rm -rf test_implicit_1/.git &&
+
+	# Create an empty .git directory so that the following Git command
+	# will stay relative to the `-C` directory.  Without this, the Git
+	# command will (override the requested -C argument) and crawl out
Why the parentheses here?
+	# to the containing Git source tree.  This would make the test
+	# result dependent upon whether we were using fsmonitor on our
+	# development worktree.
+
+	sleep 1 &&
I can understand this sleep, as we are waiting for a background process
to end in response to a directory being deleted.

I'm surprised this works on Windows! I recall having issues deleting
repos that are being watched by Watchman.
+	mkdir test_implicit_1/.git &&
+
+	test_must_fail git -C test_implicit_1 fsmonitor--daemon --is-running
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'implicit daemon stop (rename .git)' '
+	test_when_finished "kill_repo test_implicit_2" &&
+
+	git init test_implicit_2 &&
+
+	start_daemon test_implicit_2 &&
+
+	# renaming the .git directory will implicitly stop the daemon.
+	mv test_implicit_2/.git test_implicit_2/.xxx &&
+
+	# Create an empty .git directory so that the following Git command
+	# will stay relative to the `-C` directory.  Without this, the Git
+	# command will (override the requested -C argument) and crawl out
+	# to the containing Git source tree.  This would make the test
+	# result dependent upon whether we were using fsmonitor on our
+	# development worktree.
+
+	sleep 1 &&
+	mkdir test_implicit_2/.git &&
+
+	test_must_fail git -C test_implicit_2 fsmonitor--daemon --is-running
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'cannot start multiple daemons' '
+	test_when_finished "kill_repo test_multiple" &&
+
+	git init test_multiple &&
+
+	start_daemon test_multiple &&
+
+	test_must_fail git -C test_multiple fsmonitor--daemon --start 2>actual &&
+	grep "fsmonitor--daemon is already running" actual &&
+
+	git -C test_multiple fsmonitor--daemon --stop &&
+	test_must_fail git -C test_multiple fsmonitor--daemon --is-running
+'
The tests above seem like they could be inserted as soon as the
platform-specific listeners are created. None of this requires the
linked-list of batched updates or cookie file checks.
+test_expect_success 'setup' '
+	>tracked &&
+	>modified &&
+	>delete &&
+	>rename &&
+	mkdir dir1 &&
+	>dir1/tracked &&
+	>dir1/modified &&
+	>dir1/delete &&
+	>dir1/rename &&
+	mkdir dir2 &&
+	>dir2/tracked &&
+	>dir2/modified &&
+	>dir2/delete &&
+	>dir2/rename &&
+	mkdir dirtorename &&
+	>dirtorename/a &&
+	>dirtorename/b &&
+
+	cat >.gitignore <<-\EOF &&
+	.gitignore
+	expect*
+	actual*
+	EOF
+
+	git -c core.useBuiltinFSMonitor= add . &&
+	test_tick &&
+	git -c core.useBuiltinFSMonitor= commit -m initial &&
+
+	git config core.useBuiltinFSMonitor true
+'
Now we are getting into the meat of the interactions with Git
features. I can understand these not being ready until all of
the previous product patches are in place.
+test_expect_success 'update-index implicitly starts daemon' '
+	test_must_fail git fsmonitor--daemon --is-running &&
+
+	GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$PWD/.git/trace_implicit_1" \
+		git update-index --fsmonitor &&
+
+	git fsmonitor--daemon --is-running &&
+	test_might_fail git fsmonitor--daemon --stop &&
Should this be a "test_when_finished kill_repo ." at the
beginning of the test?
+
+	grep \"event\":\"start\".*\"fsmonitor--daemon\" .git/trace_implicit_1
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'status implicitly starts daemon' '
+	test_must_fail git fsmonitor--daemon --is-running &&
+
+	GIT_TRACE2_EVENT="$PWD/.git/trace_implicit_2" \
+		git status >actual &&
+
+	git fsmonitor--daemon --is-running &&
+	test_might_fail git fsmonitor--daemon --stop &&
+
+	grep \"event\":\"start\".*\"fsmonitor--daemon\" .git/trace_implicit_2
+'
+
+edit_files() {
+	echo 1 >modified
+	echo 2 >dir1/modified
+	echo 3 >dir2/modified
+	>dir1/untracked
+}
+
+delete_files() {
+	rm -f delete
+	rm -f dir1/delete
+	rm -f dir2/delete
+}
+
+create_files() {
+	echo 1 >new
+	echo 2 >dir1/new
+	echo 3 >dir2/new
+}
+
+rename_files() {
+	mv rename renamed
+	mv dir1/rename dir1/renamed
+	mv dir2/rename dir2/renamed
+}
+
+file_to_directory() {
+	rm -f delete
+	mkdir delete
+	echo 1 >delete/new
+}
+
+directory_to_file() {
+	rm -rf dir1
+	echo 1 >dir1
+}
+
+verify_status() {
+	git status >actual &&
+	GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/fresh-index git read-tree master &&
+	GIT_INDEX_FILE=.git/fresh-index git -c core.useBuiltinFSMonitor= status >expect &&
+	test_cmp expect actual &&
+	echo HELLO AFTER &&
+	cat .git/trace &&
+	echo HELLO AFTER
+}
+
+# The next few test cases confirm that our fsmonitor daemon sees each type
+# of OS filesystem notification that we care about.  At this layer we just
+# ensure we are getting the OS notifications and do not try to confirm what
+# is reported by `git status`.
+#
+# We run a simple query after modifying the filesystem just to introduce
+# a bit of a delay so that the trace logging from the daemon has time to
+# get flushed to disk.
+#
+# We `reset` and `clean` at the bottom of each test (and before stopping the
+# daemon) because these commands might implicitly restart the daemon.
+
+clean_up_repo_and_stop_daemon () {
+	git reset --hard HEAD
+	git clean -fd
+	git fsmonitor--daemon --stop
+	rm -f .git/trace
+}
+
+test_expect_success 'edit some files' '
+	test_when_finished "clean_up_repo_and_stop_daemon" &&
Do you need the quotes here?
+
+	(
+		GIT_TRACE_FSMONITOR="$PWD/.git/trace" &&
Use "$(pwd)/.git/trace". There are some strange things with $PWD
especially on Windows.
+		export GIT_TRACE_FSMONITOR &&
+
+		start_daemon
+	) &&
+
+	edit_files &&
+
+	git fsmonitor--daemon --query 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
+
+	grep "^event: dir1/modified$"  .git/trace &&
+	grep "^event: dir2/modified$"  .git/trace &&
+	grep "^event: modified$"       .git/trace &&
+	grep "^event: dir1/untracked$" .git/trace
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'create some files' '
+	test_when_finished "clean_up_repo_and_stop_daemon" &&
+
+	(
+		GIT_TRACE_FSMONITOR="$PWD/.git/trace" &&
+		export GIT_TRACE_FSMONITOR &&
+
+		start_daemon
+	) &&
+
+	create_files &&
+
+	git fsmonitor--daemon --query 0 >/dev/null 2>&1 &&
+
+	grep "^event: dir1/new$" .git/trace &&
+	grep "^event: dir2/new$" .git/trace &&
+	grep "^event: new$"      .git/trace
+'
I wonder if we can scan the trace for the number of events
and ensure we have the right count, to ensure we aren't getting
_extra_ events that we don't want?

The rest of the tests seem similarly structured and testing
important cases. I'll delay thinking of new tests until I see
the rest of the tests you are adding.

Thanks,
-Stolee
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help