[PATCH v2 03/21] split-index: add {add,remove}_split_index() functions
flat view
STALE3576d
SUPERSEDED
From: Christian Couder <hidden>
Date: 2016-12-17 14:57:04
Subsystem:
the rest · Maintainer:
Linus Torvalds
Revision v2 of 6 in this series.
Revisions (6)
Also use the functions in cmd_update_index() in builtin/update-index.c. These functions will be used in a following commit to tweak our use of the split-index feature depending on the setting of a configuration variable. Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <redacted> --- builtin/update-index.c | 18 ++++++------------ split-index.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++ split-index.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin/update-index.c b/builtin/update-index.c
index f3f07e7f1c..b75ea037dd 100644
--- a/builtin/update-index.c
+++ b/builtin/update-index.c@@ -1098,18 +1098,12 @@ int cmd_update_index(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix) } if (split_index > 0) { - init_split_index(&the_index); - the_index.cache_changed |= SPLIT_INDEX_ORDERED; - } else if (!split_index && the_index.split_index) { - /* - * can't discard_split_index(&the_index); because that - * will destroy split_index->base->cache[], which may - * be shared with the_index.cache[]. So yeah we're - * leaking a bit here. - */ - the_index.split_index = NULL; - the_index.cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED; - } + if (the_index.split_index) + the_index.cache_changed |= SPLIT_INDEX_ORDERED; + else + add_split_index(&the_index); + } else if (!split_index) + remove_split_index(&the_index); switch (untracked_cache) { case UC_UNSPECIFIED:
diff --git a/split-index.c b/split-index.c
index 615f4cac05..f519e60f87 100644
--- a/split-index.c
+++ b/split-index.c@@ -317,3 +317,25 @@ void replace_index_entry_in_base(struct index_state *istate, istate->split_index->base->cache[new->index - 1] = new; } } + +void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate) +{ + if (!istate->split_index) { + init_split_index(istate); + istate->cache_changed |= SPLIT_INDEX_ORDERED; + } +} + +void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate) +{ + if (istate->split_index) { + /* + * can't discard_split_index(&the_index); because that + * will destroy split_index->base->cache[], which may + * be shared with the_index.cache[]. So yeah we're + * leaking a bit here. + */ + istate->split_index = NULL; + istate->cache_changed |= SOMETHING_CHANGED; + } +}
diff --git a/split-index.h b/split-index.h
index c1324f521a..df91c1bda8 100644
--- a/split-index.h
+++ b/split-index.h@@ -31,5 +31,7 @@ void merge_base_index(struct index_state *istate); void prepare_to_write_split_index(struct index_state *istate); void finish_writing_split_index(struct index_state *istate); void discard_split_index(struct index_state *istate); +void add_split_index(struct index_state *istate); +void remove_split_index(struct index_state *istate); #endif
--
2.11.0.49.g2414764.dirty