Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

Hi,

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Carl Worth wrote:

quoted

It might even make sense to invent one more name for the case where
the user wants to inform git that a file has been edited and that git
should accept the new contents. It's the sort of "note that file is
edited" operation that could be recommended to the user with "add; fix
typo; commit" confusion.

I suggest "commit". How about this: after editing the file, you tell git 
that you finished editing it by doing

	git commit the-edited-file.txt

Hmmm?

Sure.  ;-)