Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".
From: Josef Weidendorfer <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:37:57
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Jakub Narebski <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Andy Whitcroft <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
On Thursday 30 November 2006 22:37, Carl Worth wrote:
So I'd vote for "resolve" along with something else for the mark-as-edited case. Maybe "refresh"? That's the best I've thought of so far. Anyone else have a better suggestion?
git stage