Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".
From: Alan Chandler <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 20:16:16
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Jakub Narebski <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Andy Whitcroft <hidden>
- 2016-08-11 · Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
On Friday 01 December 2006 08:34, Andy Parkins wrote:
How about this:
...
Hence, git-add becomes git-prepare and does
Why can't it stay as git-add It means "add the current state of the content to the index" It has the useful property that git-commit -a can be seen as a short cut for add all the files in the working try and commit. -- Alan Chandler