(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Steven Grimm <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Sam Vilain <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Johannes Schindelin <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Johannes Schindelin <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Andreas Ericsson <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Carl Worth <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Nicolas Pitre <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Carl Worth <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Carl Worth <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Robert Shearman <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Jakub Narebski <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Marco Costalba <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Shawn Pearce <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Nicolas Pitre <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Andy Parkins <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Alan Chandler <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Jakub Narebski <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Carl Worth <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Michael K. Edwards <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Carl Worth <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Jakub Narebski <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Johannes Schindelin <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Johannes Schindelin <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Nicolas Pitre <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Nicolas Pitre <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Josef Weidendorfer <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Jakub Narebski <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Carl Worth <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Andreas Ericsson <hidden> · 2016-08-11
Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a". · Han-Wen Nienhuys <hidden> · 2016-08-11

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Making "git commit" to mean "git commit -a".

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-08-11 19:53:22

Hi,

On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Jakub Narebski wrote:

What about "git update"?

... and suffer another thread a la "pull/merge"? Please no.

Ciao,
Dscho

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help