Thread (134 messages) flat view 134 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15
STALE3742d

Revision v8 of 6 in this series.

Revisions (6)
  1. v6 [diff vs current]
  2. v7 [diff vs current]
  3. v8 current
  4. v9 [diff vs current]
  5. v10 [diff vs current]
  6. v12 [diff vs current]

[PATCH v8 39/44] refs.c: move the check for valid refname to lock_ref_sha1_basic

From: Ronnie Sahlberg <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 23:01:10
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

Move the check for check_refname_format from lock_any_ref_for_update
to lock_ref_sha1_basic. At some later stage we will get rid of
lock_any_ref_for_update completely.

This leaves lock_any_ref_for_updates as a no-op wrapper which could be removed.
But this wrapper is also called from an external caller and we will soon
make changes to the signature to lock_ref_sha1_basic that we do not want to
expose to that caller.

Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <redacted>
---
 refs.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/refs.c b/refs.c
index 79d95db..53fdbd1 100644
--- a/refs.c
+++ b/refs.c
@@ -2044,6 +2044,9 @@ static struct ref_lock *lock_ref_sha1_basic(const char *refname,
 	int missing = 0;
 	int attempts_remaining = 3;
 
+	if (check_refname_format(refname, REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL))
+		return NULL;
+
 	lock = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct ref_lock));
 	lock->lock_fd = -1;
 
@@ -2135,8 +2138,6 @@ struct ref_lock *lock_any_ref_for_update(const char *refname,
 					 const unsigned char *old_sha1,
 					 int flags, int *type_p)
 {
-	if (check_refname_format(refname, REFNAME_ALLOW_ONELEVEL))
-		return NULL;
 	return lock_ref_sha1_basic(refname, old_sha1, flags, type_p);
 }
 
-- 
2.0.0.rc3.477.g0f8edf7
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help