Re: [PATCH 2/8] revert: decouple sequencer actions from builtin commands

Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:

More than the pain of rebasing the patch everytime, I guess what I'm
asking is: is it worth stretching my foresight like this?  Once the
code is in sequencer.c, it just becomes so much easier for me to write
scratch code to help me wrap my head around the generalization.

In that case, why not just a patch to move the code to sequencer.c,
with whatever is the minimum of related fixes (just namespace stuff,
I'd imagine) before it?