Thread (113 messages) 113 messages, 8 authors, 2021-11-04

[dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/5] mcslock: use wait until scheme for mcslock

From: Feifei Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-11-01 06:00:41
Subsystem: library code, the rest · Maintainers: Andrew Morton, Linus Torvalds

Instead of polling for mcslock to be updated, use wait until scheme
for this case.

Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <redacted>
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <redacted>
---
 lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h
index 34f33c64a5..753836d23c 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h
+++ b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h
@@ -116,8 +116,9 @@ rte_mcslock_unlock(rte_mcslock_t **msl, rte_mcslock_t *me)
 		/* More nodes added to the queue by other CPUs.
 		 * Wait until the next pointer is set.
 		 */
-		while (__atomic_load_n(&me->next, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) == NULL)
-			rte_pause();
+		uintptr_t *next;
+		next = (uintptr_t *)&me->next;
+		RTE_WAIT_UNTIL_MASKED(next, UINTPTR_MAX, !=, 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
 	}
 
 	/* Pass lock to next waiter. */
-- 
2.25.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help