Thread (113 messages) 113 messages, 8 authors, 2021-11-04

[dpdk-dev] 回复: [PATCH v7 3/5] eal: use wait event scheme for mcslock

From: Feifei Wang <hidden>
Date: 2021-10-28 07:14:52

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: dev [off-list ref] 代表 Jerin Jacob
发送时间: Thursday, October 28, 2021 3:02 PM
收件人: Feifei Wang [off-list ref]
抄送: Honnappa Nagarahalli [off-list ref]; dpdk-dev
[off-list ref]; nd [off-list ref]; Ananyev, Konstantin
[off-list ref]; Stephen Hemminger
[off-list ref]; David Marchand
[off-list ref]; thomas@monjalon.net; Mattias Rönnblom
[off-list ref]; Ruifeng Wang [off-list ref]
主题: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/5] eal: use wait event scheme for mcslock

On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 12:27 PM Feifei Wang [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
Instead of polling for mcslock to be updated, use wait event scheme
for this case.

Furthermore, use 'uintptr_t *' is for different size of pointer in
32/64 bits architecture.

And define a new pointer 'next' for the compilation error:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
'dereferencing type-punned pointer will break strict-aliasing rules'
-------------------------------------------------------------------

Signed-off-by: Feifei Wang <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <redacted>
---
 lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h
b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h
index 34f33c64a5..d5b9b293cd 100644
--- a/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h
+++ b/lib/eal/include/generic/rte_mcslock.h
@@ -116,8 +116,9 @@ rte_mcslock_unlock(rte_mcslock_t **msl,
rte_mcslock_t *me)
quoted
                /* More nodes added to the queue by other CPUs.
                 * Wait until the next pointer is set.
                 */
-               while (__atomic_load_n(&me->next, __ATOMIC_RELAXED) ==
NULL)
quoted
-                       rte_pause();
+               uintptr_t *next = NULL;
It is going to update in the next line. Why explicit NULL assignment?
You are right, it is unnecessary to initialize it as NULL. I will update this.
quoted
+               next = (uintptr_t *)&me->next;
+               rte_wait_event(next, UINTPTR_MAX, ==, 0,
+ __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
        }

        /* Pass lock to next waiter. */
--
2.25.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help