Re: [dpdk-dev] [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 03/37] net/mvpp2: fix Rx/Tx bytes statistics
From: Ferruh Yigit <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-26 17:29:30
On 1/26/2021 5:25 PM, Liron Himi wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Ferruh Yigit <redacted> Sent: Tuesday, 26 January 2021 19:03 To: Liron Himi <redacted>; Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran <redacted> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Yuri Chipchev <redacted>; stable@dpdk.org; Andrew Rybchenko <redacted> Subject: [EXT] Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 03/37] net/mvpp2: fix Rx/Tx bytes statistics External Email ---------------------------------------------------------------------- On 1/22/2021 7:18 PM, lironh@marvell.com wrote:quoted
From: Yuri Chipchev <redacted> 4B of CRC was not included in the bytes statistics Fixes: bdffe0c70 ("net/mrvl: support basic stats") Cc: stable@dpdk.org Signed-off-by: Yuri Chipchev <redacted> Reviewed-by: Liron Himi <redacted> --- drivers/net/mvpp2/mrvl_ethdev.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/net/mvpp2/mrvl_ethdev.cb/drivers/net/mvpp2/mrvl_ethdev.c index bfe496ff7..a1a3c0e31 100644--- a/drivers/net/mvpp2/mrvl_ethdev.c +++ b/drivers/net/mvpp2/mrvl_ethdev.c@@ -1278,7 +1278,6 @@ mrvl_stats_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_stats *stats) rx_stats.drop_fullq + rx_stats.drop_bm + rxq->drop_mac; - stats->ibytes += rxq->bytes_recv; drop_mac += rxq->drop_mac; }@@ -1306,7 +1305,6 @@ mrvl_stats_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, structrte_eth_stats *stats) stats->q_opackets[idx] = tx_stats.deq_desc; stats->q_obytes[idx] = txq->bytes_sent; - stats->obytes += txq->bytes_sent; } ret = pp2_ppio_get_statistics(priv->ppio, &ppio_stats, 0); @@ -1315,6 +1313,8 @@ mrvl_stats_get(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, struct rte_eth_stats *stats) return ret; } + stats->ibytes += ppio_stats.rx_bytes; + stats->obytes += ppio_stats.tx_bytes; stats->ipackets += ppio_stats.rx_packets - drop_mac; stats->opackets += ppio_stats.tx_packets; stats->imissed += ppio_stats.rx_fullq_dropped +Is this patch adding CRC to the stats? If so that is wrong, stats should not have the CRC. A recent clarification from Andrew: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__patches.dpdk.org_patch_86975_&d=DwIDaQ&c=nKjWec2b6R0mOyPaz7xtfQ&r=M6lEONY3jVnAkBjt0yC6oAsT7Jn2HI7LhNHCQYlnx1Q&m=iYhQSv2FUrmxLNQcxo6cAiLpoeqeTx1mQKadLot0jh0&s=lYaS0RY6n4QOlhzd3Z9PTxtR42lbqxPt1Pm1uODpWJg&e= [L.H.] okay, so based on this new clarification, this patch should not be merged to both next and stable branches. thanks
sure, I can drop it in next-net.