On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 09:51:45AM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:

Hi Thomas,

quoted

2016-12-23 09:36, Ananyev, Konstantin:

quoted

From: Michal Miroslaw [mailto:mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl]

quoted

On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 06:48:52PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:

quoted

I suppose that changes have to be inside:
[PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict.

The 'allow zero verdict' patch depends on this one if we are to not have
a breaking tests inbetween.

Exactly, that's why I think they either has to be in one series of patches,
with this one coming first and ' PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict' as the second one,
or just merge them into one.

No progress here.
Konstantin, do you ack this patch?

Yes, I do.
I just thought that the author would resubmit it as part of 
' PATCH v2] acl: allow zero verdict'
to comply with DPDK patch submission rules.
Konstantin

quoted

I could apply it as a standalone patch.

Sorry for the delay. I'll do just that in a moment.

Best Regards,
Michał Mirosław