Re: [PATCH -V8 05/16] hugetlb: avoid taking i_mmap_mutex in unmap_single_vma() for hugetlb
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: 2012-06-09 09:44:59
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Date: 2012-06-09 09:44:59
Also in:
linux-mm, lkml
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 02:29:50PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <redacted>
i_mmap_mutex lock was added in unmap_single_vma by 502717f4e ("hugetlb:
fix linked list corruption in unmap_hugepage_range()") but we don't use
page->lru in unmap_hugepage_range any more. Also the lock was taken
higher up in the stack in some code path. That would result in deadlock.
unmap_mapping_range (i_mmap_mutex)
-> unmap_mapping_range_tree
-> unmap_mapping_range_vma
-> zap_page_range_single
-> unmap_single_vma
-> unmap_hugepage_range (i_mmap_mutex)
For shared pagetable support for huge pages, since pagetable pages are ref
counted we don't need any lock during huge_pmd_unshare. We do take
i_mmap_mutex in huge_pmd_share while walking the vma_prio_tree in mapping.
(39dde65c9940c97f ("shared page table for hugetlb page")).
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <redacted>This patch (together with the previous one) seems like a bugfix that's not really related to the hugetlb controller, unless I miss something. Could you please submit the fix separately? Maybe also fold the two patches into one and make it a single bugfix change that gets rid of the lock by switching away from page->lru. Thanks -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>