Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] s390/cio: introduce DMA pools to cio
From: Michael Mueller <hidden>
Date: 2019-06-03 13:43:39
Also in:
kvm, linux-s390
On 03.06.19 15:34, Cornelia Huck wrote:
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:57:30 +0200 Halil Pasic [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 14:09:02 +0200 Michael Mueller [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
quoted
@@ -224,6 +226,8 @@ struct subchannel *css_alloc_subchannel(struct subchannel_id schid, INIT_WORK(&sch->todo_work, css_sch_todo); sch->dev.release = &css_subchannel_release; device_initialize(&sch->dev);It might be helpful to add a comment why you use 31 bit here...@Halil, please let me know what comment you prefere here...How about? /* * The physical addresses of some the dma structures that * can belong to a subchannel need to fit 31 bit width (examples ccw,). */"e.g. ccw"?quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
+ sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(31); + sch->dev.dma_mask = &sch->dev.coherent_dma_mask; return sch; err:@@ -899,6 +903,8 @@ static int __init setup_css(int nr) dev_set_name(&css->device, "css%x", nr); css->device.groups = cssdev_attr_groups; css->device.release = channel_subsystem_release;...and 64 bit here.and here./* * We currently allocate notifier bits with this (using css->device * as the device argument with the DMA API), and are fine with 64 bit * addresses. */Thanks, that makes things hopefully clearer if we look at it some time in the future ;)
Applied both with with requested change. Michael