On 08/08/2013 02:13 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

On 08/07/2013 06:02 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 08:50:12PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 12:15:21PM +0530, Raghavendra K T wrote:

quoted

On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

quoted

quoted

Please let me know, if I should rebase again.

tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next.  We need
to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.

Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected.
(Xen, kvm are obvious ones).
Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.

quoted

From the Xen standpoint anything past v3.11-rc4 would work.

For KVM as early as past v3.11-rc1 would be OK.

I'm still completely confused as to the base of this patchset.  The
first patch has the following hunk for arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:

Okay, I figured it out.

One of several problems with the formatting of this patchset is that it
has one- and two-digit patch numbers in the headers, which meant that my
scripts tried to apply patch 10 first.

	-hpa