Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Date: 2013-08-07 04:50:00
Also in:
kvm, lkml, xen-devel
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Raghavendra K T <hidden>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Raghavendra K T <hidden>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Raghavendra K T <hidden>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden>
On 08/06/2013 07:54 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
On 08/07/2013 02:31 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:quoted
What is the baseline for this patchset? I tried to apply it on top of 3.11-rc4 and I got nontrivial conflicts.I had based it on top of 445363e8 [ Merge branch 'perf/urgent'] of tip. Sorry for not mentioning that. Please let me know, if I should rebase again.
tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set. -hpa