Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
From: Raghavendra K T <hidden>
Date: 2013-08-07 06:39:10
Also in:
kvm, lkml, xen-devel
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Raghavendra K T <hidden>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Raghavendra K T <hidden>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Raghavendra K T <hidden>
- 2013-08-09 · Re: [PATCH V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks · Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <hidden>
On 08/07/2013 10:18 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted
Please let me know, if I should rebase again.tip:master is not a stable branch; it is more like linux-next. We need to figure out which topic branches are dependencies for this set.
Okay. I 'll start looking at the branches that would get affected. (Xen, kvm are obvious ones). Please do let me know the branches I might have to check for.