RE: [PATCH 18/25] Staging: hv: storvsc: Eliminate the usage of ext field in struct hv_device
From: KY Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com>
Date: 2011-09-10 14:16:18
Also in:
lkml
-----Original Message----- From: Greg KH [mailto:greg@kroah.com] Sent: Friday, September 09, 2011 4:45 PM To: KY Srinivasan Cc: gregkh@suse.de; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; devel@linuxdriverproject.org; virtualization@lists.osdl.org; Haiyang Zhang Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/25] Staging: hv: storvsc: Eliminate the usage of ext field in struct hv_device On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 07:24:29AM -0700, K. Y. Srinivasan wrote:quoted
Now, eliminate the usage of ext field in struct hv_device for storvsc driver. We do this by registering pointer to struct storvsc_device as the driver specific data and eliminating the current usage of driver specific data to save and retrieve the pointer to struct Scsi_Host. Additionally, all access to the driver specific data is through the vmbus wrapper functions. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <kys@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com> --- drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c b/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c index 57c1035..98d47cd 100644 --- a/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c +++ b/drivers/staging/hv/storvsc_drv.c@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ struct storvsc_device { bool destroy; bool drain_notify; atomic_t num_outstanding_req; + struct Scsi_Host *host;You are properly reference counting this pointer, right?
The scsi_host_alloc() which we use to allocate the host structure, gives us the needed reference.
quoted
@@ -306,7 +307,8 @@ static inline struct storvsc_device*get_out_stor_device(quoted
{ struct storvsc_device *stor_device; - stor_device = (struct storvsc_device *)device->ext; + stor_device = + (struct storvsc_device *)hv_get_drvdata(device);Casting is not needed at all.quoted
@@ -1366,7 +1371,8 @@ static int storvsc_probe(struct hv_device *device, stor_device->destroy = false; init_waitqueue_head(&stor_device->waiting_to_drain); stor_device->device = device; - device->ext = stor_device; + stor_device->host = host; + hv_set_drvdata(device, stor_device);Lookie there, no reference count incremented, right? Or did I miss it somewhere else?
We are stashing the pointer to a structure on which we already have a reference (that was established at the point of allocating the host). Regards, K. Y