Re: hardwired VMI crap
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-09 00:44:23
Also in:
lkml
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
Once you are there, you are near the point where you created a virtual architecture, which could run on any real architecture which gets supported by a hypervisor backend. I'd love that :)
Sure. But not even hypervisors. Once we sort out pv_ops's SMP support, it will be this >< close to covering everything in the subarch interface. So we can drop all that goo in favour of paravirt_ops, and make a single kernel that will boot on everything from voyager to numa-q! How's that for world peace?
I know it is tricky to combine this with the upcoming hardware virtualization support. But it's at least a worthwhile thought experiment.
Well, in many ways that's a step backwards. The upside is that its
easier to get away with simply emulating the some particular piece
hardware, but it does lose a lot of opportunities for interesting
flexibility and optimisations.
But I anticipate we'll get a xen-hvm pv_ops backend, for running under
Xen with a virtualizing cpu. It will probably look a lot like kvm's
pv_ops backend.
J