Re: hardwired VMI crap
From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-08 23:58:37
Also in:
lkml
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 15:39 -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Ingo Molnar wrote:quoted
- /One/ _intelligent_ higher-level virtualization API/ABI. Xen's API is quite advanced on this front.At last! Some love! The Xen approach has always been to prefer high-level interfaces over lower-level ones, so that guests can meaningfully participate in their own virtualization. There are some necessarily low-level things, but conceptually simple things like "create a new vcpu" should have simple interfaces. There's no point in going to the effort of emulating a whole pile of real hardware if Xen can present an interface which is a close match to an existing high-level interface within the operating system.
Once you are there, you are near the point where you created a virtual architecture, which could run on any real architecture which gets supported by a hypervisor backend. I'd love that :) I know it is tricky to combine this with the upcoming hardware virtualization support. But it's at least a worthwhile thought experiment. tglx