Thread (87 messages) 87 messages, 12 authors, 2007-03-08

Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-07 21:08:47
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:49 -0800, Dan Hecht wrote:
On 03/07/2007 12:11 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
quoted
Dan Hecht wrote:
quoted
Jeremy, I saw you sent out the Xen version earlier, thanks.  Here's
ours for reference (please excuse any formating issues); it's also
lean. We'll send out a proper patch later after some more testing:
So the interrupt side of the clockevent comes through the virtual apic? 
Where does evt->handle_event get called?
Yeah, we use the same interrupt handlers as normal i386: timer_interrupt 
and smp_apic_timer_interrupt.  That way we don't need to duplicate the 
interrupt handler code.
Oh well. Here we are again. 2 hypervisors - 4 different views on how to
inject events into the kernel.

This is the complete wrong approach. Paravirtualization should not abuse
existing hardware drivers. It should just provide their own sane
abstract implementation.

Please stop this _NOW_

	tglx
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help