Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-07 18:28:32
Also in:
lkml
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-07 18:28:32
Also in:
lkml
Ingo Molnar wrote:
/For you/ it's certainly no big deal, you dont have to fix it up and you dont have to keep it flexible ;)
How flexible does it need to be? Its a simple time source and event driver. How flexible does the pit driver need to be? It's just a small leaf node hanging off a large existing piece of kernel infrastructure.
and really, i'm not expecting miracles, i've never seen any hardware vendor argue /against/ support for their own hardware =B-)
And since when has it been kernel policy to argue against including a
well written, self-contained, vendor-provided driver for a piece of
hardware?
J