Thread (87 messages) 87 messages, 12 authors, 2007-03-08

Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree

From: Thomas Gleixner <hidden>
Date: 2007-03-07 18:50:42
Also in: lkml

On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 13:11 -0500, James Morris wrote:
On Wed, 7 Mar 2007, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
quoted
I was very pleased when I saw the clocksource/event mechanisms go into
the kernel because it means different hypervisors can have a clock*
implementation to match their own particular time model/interface
without having to clutter up the pv_ops interface, and still have a
well-defined interface to the rest of the kernel's time infrastructure.
It seems to me that it could be useful to have a library of common virtual 
time code (entirely separate from pv_ops), to avoid re-implementing some 
apparently common requirements, such as: handling TSC frequency changes, 
stolen time accounting, synthetic programmable clockevent etc.
Yes please. Expose sane emulated silicon to the kernel core and maintain
your hypervisor decisions behind that silicon instead of exposing us to
10 different silicon versions with 20 bugs each.

	tglx
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help