Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86 paravirt_ops: implementation of paravirt_ops
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-07 05:40:51
Also in:
lkml
From: Andi Kleen <hidden>
Date: 2006-08-07 05:40:51
Also in:
lkml
On Monday 07 August 2006 06:47, Rusty Russell wrote:
This patch does the dumbest possible replacement of paravirtualized instructions: calls through a "paravirt_ops" structure. Currently these are function implementations of native hardware: hypervisors will override the ops structure with their own variants.
You should call it HAL - that would make it clearer what it is. I think I would prefer to patch always. Is there a particular reason you can't do that? -Andi