Re: [PATCH net-next v2 00/14] dpll: add a simulated DPLL device driver

From
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
Date
2026-11-06 12:27:30
Also in
linux-doc, linux-kselftest
Reply to
Petr Oros, 2026-11-05
Thu, Nov 05, 2026 at 04:18:38PM +0100, poros@redhat.com wrote:
The DPLL subsystem has no in-tree driver that can run without real
hardware, so core changes and userspace tooling are hard to exercise in
CI, and the pin-on-pin and reference sync paths see almost no coverage
outside the vendors' labs. This series adds dpllsim, a simulated DPLL
device driver, together with selftests that run against it.

The driver is controlled through configfs, following gpio-sim. Writing a
clock ID into a device directory and setting "live" to 1 registers a
DPLL device with the core. Pins are directories under pins/ with their
type, frequency, direction and priority as attributes, and all of them
are registered when the device goes live. The split between creating
the configuration and going live keeps the register and unregister
paths reachable from userspace, so they can be exercised repeatedly
without reloading the module. Nothing in the simulator is a stable ABI.

The patches follow the shape of the zl3073x introduction. The
driver starts with the device alone, then gains pins and the static pin
operations one at a time (state, priority, frequency, phase adjustment),
and every feature patch is followed by the selftest that covers it. The
last two patches add concurrency stress tests and reference tracker
leak tests for the lifecycle paths.

The simulation loop (lock state machine, phase and frequency
measurements, monitoring features), the topology features (MUX pin
hierarchies, reference sync, media failure injection), netdevsim
integration and device mode setting follow in two further series once
this one is in, to stay within the 15 patch limit.

The driver and the selftests were developed with an LLM coding
assistant (Claude Code) working under my direction. I chose the
configfs design, the split into one feature per patch and the test
scenarios, and I reviewed every line. The assistant wrote most of the
code and the first drafts of the changelogs, and it found and fixed
bugs by running the suite on the lab host. The series then went
through several rounds of an LLM based patch reviewer whose findings
were fixed, and through a mutation test in which deliberately broken
driver and core code was caught by the tests.

The selftests live in tools/testing/selftests/drivers/net/dpll and run
with "make -C tools/testing/selftests TARGETS=drivers/net/dpll
run_tests". By default they create dpllsim devices; with
DPLL_DEV_ID=<id> the basic and feature scripts run against an existing
device instead, so the same suite exercises real hardware. The whole
suite was run through the kselftest runner on an ice E810 host with
CONFIG_KASAN, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING and CONFIG_DPLL_REFCNT_TRACKER
enabled, against the simulator and, with DPLL_DEV_ID, against the ice
DPLL, where the tests that need a simulator skip and the pin state and
priorities of the hardware are left as they were. All pass with no
warnings in dmesg.
set-
Acked-by: Jiri Pirko <redacted>
Thread (30 messages) 30 messages, 3 authors, last reply 1d ago
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread / next series-diff position
kprevious message in thread / previous series-diff position
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help