On 06/02, Jakub Kicinski wrote:

Jakub suggests renaming the existing assert to match
the netdev_lock_ops_compat() semantics.

We want netdev_assert_locked_ops() to mean - if the driver
is ops locked - check that it's holding the device lock.

The existing helper check for either ops lock or rtnl_lock,
which is the locking behavior of netdev_lock_ops_compat().

The reason for naming divergence is likely that
netdev_ops_assert_locked() predated the _compat() helpers.

Suggested-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@fomichev.me>