Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 3 authors, 2026-02-11

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, adding tests

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Date: 2026-02-11 09:42:33
Also in: bridge, lkml

On Tue, Feb 10, 2026 at 10:06:58PM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 06:00:46PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
+test_inactive_other_querier_norespdelay()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	test_active_setup_bridge "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6"
+	test_active_setup_config "1" "2" "3" ""
+	#test_active_setup_wait
Why the comment? There are more instances below
The intention was just to highlight what was skipped in comparison
to the according test_{vlan,}_active_*_querier() variants.

Do you think I should remove these lines? Or add a brief
clarification, something like "# skipped: test_active_setup_wait"?
OK, I see. A brief clarification would be good. I initially thought that
these are leftovers that you forgot to remove before submitting.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help