Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 3 authors, 2026-02-11

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, adding tests

From: Linus Lüssing <hidden>
Date: 2026-02-10 21:07:11
Also in: bridge, lkml

On Sun, Feb 08, 2026 at 06:00:46PM +0200, Ido Schimmel wrote:
[...]
quoted
+test_inactive_other_querier_norespdelay()
+{
+	RET=0
+
+	test_active_setup_bridge "1" "2" "3" "4" "5" "6"
+	test_active_setup_config "1" "2" "3" ""
+	#test_active_setup_wait
Why the comment? There are more instances below
The intention was just to highlight what was skipped in comparison
to the according test_{vlan,}_active_*_querier() variants.

Do you think I should remove these lines? Or add a brief
clarification, something like "# skipped: test_active_setup_wait"?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help