Thread (35 messages) 35 messages, 3 authors, 2026-02-11

Re: [PATCH net-next v2 11/14] net: bridge: mcast: track active state, prepare for outside lock reads

From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Date: 2026-02-08 16:11:37
Also in: bridge, lkml

On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 03:52:17AM +0100, Linus Lüssing wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
@@ -1095,23 +1095,25 @@ static void br_ip6_multicast_update_active(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
 {
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
 	if (force_inactive)
-		brmctx->ip6_active = false;
+		WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active, false);
 	else
-		brmctx->ip6_active = br_ip6_multicast_querier_exists(brmctx);
+		WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active, br_ip6_multicast_querier_exists(brmctx));
 #endif
 }
 
 static void br_multicast_notify_active(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
 				       bool ip4_active_old, bool ip6_active_old)
 {
-	if (brmctx->ip4_active == ip4_active_old &&
-	    brmctx->ip6_active == ip6_active_old)
+	int ip4_active = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip4_active);
+	int ip6_active = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active);
I believe that this is unnecessary since we are holding the lock and it
will confuse people reading the code. We only need the READ_ONCE() later
on in the data path
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+
+	if (ip4_active == ip4_active_old &&
+	    ip6_active == ip6_active_old)
 		return;
 
 	br_info(brmctx->br, "mc_active changed, vid: %i: v4: %i->%i, v6: %i->%i\n",
 		brmctx->vlan ? brmctx->vlan->vid : -1,
-		ip4_active_old, brmctx->ip4_active,
-		ip6_active_old, brmctx->ip6_active);
+		ip4_active_old, ip4_active, ip6_active_old, ip6_active);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1136,7 +1138,8 @@ static void br_multicast_notify_active(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx,
  */
 static void br_multicast_update_active(struct net_bridge_mcast *brmctx)
 {
-	bool ip4_active_old = brmctx->ip4_active, ip6_active_old = brmctx->ip6_active;
+	bool ip4_active_old = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip4_active);
+	bool ip6_active_old = READ_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active);
Same
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
 	bool force_inactive = false;
 
 	lockdep_assert_held_once(&brmctx->br->multicast_lock);
@@ -4266,13 +4269,13 @@ void br_multicast_ctx_init(struct net_bridge *br,
 	brmctx->multicast_membership_interval = 260 * HZ;
 
 	brmctx->ip4_querier.port_ifidx = 0;
-	brmctx->ip4_active = 0;
+	WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip4_active, 0);
 	seqcount_spinlock_init(&brmctx->ip4_querier.seq, &br->multicast_lock);
 	brmctx->multicast_igmp_version = 2;
 #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
 	brmctx->multicast_mld_version = 1;
 	brmctx->ip6_querier.port_ifidx = 0;
-	brmctx->ip6_active = 0;
+	WRITE_ONCE(brmctx->ip6_active, 0);
 	seqcount_spinlock_init(&brmctx->ip6_querier.seq, &br->multicast_lock);
 #endif
 
-- 
2.51.0
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help