Thread (5 messages) 5 messages, 4 authors, 2026-02-06

Re: [PATCH] [net-next] net/mlx5e: fix ip6_dst_lookup link failure

From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Date: 2026-02-06 10:00:23
Also in: linux-rdma, lkml

On Fri, Feb 6, 2026, at 10:56, Jianbo Liu wrote:
On 2/4/2026 9:00 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig
index 9cf394c66939..c298efe93f97 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/Kconfig
@@ -154,6 +154,7 @@ config MLX5_EN_IPSEC
  	depends on MLX5_CORE_EN
  	depends on XFRM_OFFLOAD
  	depends on INET_ESP_OFFLOAD || INET6_ESP_OFFLOAD
+	depends on IPV6!=m || MLX5_CORE=m
Thanks for the fix.
I received a report for this same error here: 
https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202512261850.P5Jp5BSz-lkp@intel.com/ (local)

We were about to send a fix ourselves, it is to simply add:
   depends on IPV6 || !IPV6
Is there a specific reason to prefer "depends on IPV6!=m || 
MLX5_CORE=m"? To me, the IPV6 || !IPV6 syntax seems a bit cleaner.
MLX5_EN_IPSEC needs the dependency, but this is a 'bool' symbols.

The "IPV6 || !IPV6" syntax only works on tristate symbols, so you'd
have to put it into CONFIG_MLX5_CORE itself, but MLX5_CORE does
not actually have the IPV6 dependency unless MLX5_EN_IPSEC is
enabled.

     Arnd
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help