On 11/18/25 5:10 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 7:32 PM Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

  static struct genl_family genl_family __ro_after_init = {
         .ops = genl_ops,
         .n_ops = ARRAY_SIZE(genl_ops),
-       .resv_start_op = WG_CMD_SET_DEVICE + 1,
         .name = WG_GENL_NAME,
         .version = WG_GENL_VERSION,
         .maxattr = WGDEVICE_A_MAX,

This patch is fine and standalone enough, that I merged it into my
wireguard.git devel branch:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/zx2c4/wireguard-linux.git/commit/?h=devel&id=fbd8c752a8e3d00341fa7754d6e45e60d6b45490

If you wind up rerolling the rest of these, you can do it against that branch.

If you update it, so it includes the 2 new net-next commits, then
I can send v4 based on your tree.

- [net-next,1/2] tools: ynl-gen: add function prefix argument
   https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/17fa6ee35bd4
- [net-next,2/2] tools: ynl-gen: add regeneration comment
   https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/68e83f347266

Thanks.