On Tue, 18 Nov 2025 23:52:30 +0100 Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:

On Tue, Nov 18, 2025 at 09:59:45PM +0000, Asbjørn Sloth Tønnesen wrote:

quoted

So "c-function-prefix" or something might work better.  

Also fine with me. I'd just like consistent function naming, one way or
another.

IIUC we're talking about the prefix for the kernel C codegen?
Feels a bit like a one-off feature to me, but if we care deeply about
it let's add it as a CLI param to the codegen. I don't think it's
necessary to include this in the YAML spec.