Krzysztof,

On 9/10/25 11:21 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

On 10/09/2025 16:04, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote:

quoted

Krzysztof,

On 8/21/25 3:50 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:

quoted

On Wed, Aug 20, 2025 at 02:12:55PM -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote:

quoted

Current, the DT bindings for Mediatek UFOe (Unified Frame Optimization
engine) is missing the mediatek,gce-client-reg property. Add it and

Why is it missing? If the binding is complete, it cannot be missing...

Due to the following error:

$ make -j$(nproc) CHECK_DTBS=y mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtb
    SCHEMA  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
    DTC [C] arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtb
[...]
arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8173-elm.dtb: ufoe@1401a000
(mediatek,mt8173-disp-ufoe): 'mediatek,gce-client-reg' does not match
any of the regexes: '^pinctrl-[0-9]+$'
	from schema $id:
http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml#

So there are users of it? Then please explain that.

Ack. Will fix in v2. Thanks.

quoted

quoted

quoted

update the example as well.

Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <redacted>
---
   .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml      | 11 +++++++++++
   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml
index 61a5e22effbf2..ecb4c0359fec3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,ufoe.yaml

@@ -64,6 +64,14 @@ properties:
         - port@0
         - port@1
   
+  mediatek,gce-client-reg:
+    description: The register of client driver can be configured by gce with
+      4 arguments defined in this property, such as phandle of gce, subsys id,
+      register offset and size. Each GCE subsys id is mapping to a client

Don't explain what DT syntax is. We all know, so that's completely
redundant description. Explain the purpose. Explain Arguments with sechema - items.

Although I agree with your suggestions, this is exactly how the rest of
the Mediatek DT bindings describe this node. This patch is based on the
other +20 files, which describe the node in the same way.

Last time I tried to fix something for Mediatek display I got
condescending and useless review from Collabora, so I won't be bothering
with fixing these bindings to make your job easier. I don't care, you
can thank someone inside. Therefore other poor bindings are not a valid
excuse for this patch not being correct.

I see. Will rework this properly in v2.

Thanks,

-- 
Ariel D'Alessandro
Software Engineer

Collabora Ltd.
Platinum Building, St John's Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS, UK 
Registered in England & Wales, no. 5513718