On Tue, Aug 26, 2025 at 1:44 AM Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 21:53:33 +0800 Jason Xing wrote:

quoted

copy mode:   1,109,754 pps
batch mode:  2,393,498 pps (+115.6%)
xmit.more:   3,024,110 pps (+172.5%)
zc mode:    14,879,414 pps

I've asked you multiple times to add comparison with the performance
of AF_PACKET. What's the disconnect?

Sorry for missing the question. I'm not very familiar with how to run the
test based on AF_PACKET. Could you point it out for me? Thanks.

I remember the very initial version of AF_XDP was pure AF_PACKET. So
may I ask why we expect to see the comparison between them?

Thanks,
Jason