Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] net: rnpgbe: Add build support for rnpgbe
From: Yibo Dong <dong100@mucse.com>
Date: 2025-07-23 03:02:19
Also in:
linux-doc, lkml
On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 12:29:09PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 07:32:24PM +0800, Dong Yibo wrote:quoted
Add build options and doc for mucse. Initialize pci device access for MUCSE devices. Signed-off-by: Dong Yibo <dong100@mucse.com>...quoted
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..13b49875006b --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mucse/rnpgbe/rnpgbe_main.c@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* Copyright(c) 2020 - 2025 Mucse Corporation. */ + +#include <linux/types.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/string.h> +#include <linux/etherdevice.h> + +#include "rnpgbe.h" + +char rnpgbe_driver_name[] = "rnpgbe";At least with (only) this patch applied, rnpgbe_driver_name appears to only be used in this file. So it should be static. Flagged by Sparse. Please make sure that when each patch in the series is applied in turn, no new Sparse warnings are introduced. Likewise for build errors. And ideally warnings for W=1 builds. ...
Got it, I will fix this. But I can't get this warning follow steps in my local: --- - make x86_64_defconfig - make menuconfig (select my driver rnpgbe to *) - make W=1 -j 20 --- if I compile it with 'make W=1 C=1 -j 20', some errors like this: --- ./include/linux/skbuff.h:978:1: error: directive in macro's argument list ./include/linux/skbuff.h:981:1: error: directive in macro's argument list ........ Segmentation fault --- I also tried to use nipa/tests/patch/build_allmodconfig_warn /build_allmodconfig.sh (not run the bot, just copy this sh to source code). It seems the same with 'make W=1 C=1 -j 20'. Is there something wrong for me? I want to get the warnings locally, then I can check it before sending patches. Any suggestions to me, please? Thanks for your feedback.