Thread (65 messages) 65 messages, 6 authors, 2025-07-25

Re: [PATCH v2 03/15] net: rnpgbe: Add basic mbx ops support

From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Date: 2025-07-22 13:51:05
Also in: linux-doc, lkml

On Tue, Jul 22, 2025 at 02:45:30PM +0800, Yibo Dong wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 05:43:41PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
quoted
quoted
 #define MAX_VF_NUM (8)
quoted
+	hw->max_vfs = 7;
???
This is mistake, max vfs is 7. 8 is '7 vfs + 1 pf'.
So it seems like you need to add a new #define for MAX_FUNCS_NUM, and
set MAX_VF_NUM to 7. And then actually use MAX_VP_NUM. When reviewing
your own code, seeing the number 7, not a define, should of been a
warning, something is wrong....
quoted
quoted
+static int mucse_obtain_mbx_lock_pf(struct mucse_hw *hw, enum MBX_ID mbx_id)
+{
+	struct mucse_mbx_info *mbx = &hw->mbx;
+	int try_cnt = 5000, ret;
+	u32 reg;
+
+	reg = (mbx_id == MBX_FW) ? PF2FW_MBOX_CTRL(mbx) :
+				   PF2VF_MBOX_CTRL(mbx, mbx_id);
+	while (try_cnt-- > 0) {
+		/* Take ownership of the buffer */
+		mbx_wr32(hw, reg, MBOX_PF_HOLD);
+		/* force write back before check */
+		wmb();
+		if (mbx_rd32(hw, reg) & MBOX_PF_HOLD)
+			return 0;
+		udelay(100);
+	}
+	return ret;
I've not compiled this, but isn't ret uninitialized here? I would also
expect it to return -ETIMEDOUT?

	Andrew
Yes, ret is uninitialized. I will fix this.
Did the compiler give a warning? Code should be warning free. We also
expect networking code to be W=1 warning free.

	Andrew
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help