Le Mon, 16 Jun 2025 09:56:58 -0700,
Jakub Kicinski [off-list ref] a écrit :
On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:14:37 +0200 Kory Maincent wrote:
quoted
quoted
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:11:41 +0200 Kory Maincent wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
the only caller of this function seems to negate the return value:
drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c:369: if
(!pse_pi_is_admin_enable_not_applied(pcdev, i))
let's avoid the double negation ?
I thought it was better for comprehension.
If we inverse the behavior we would have a function name like that:
pse_pi_is_admin_disable_not_detected_or_applied()
Do you have a better proposition?
Would pse_pi_is_admin_enable_pending() work?
Indeed that could work! Thanks!
--
Köry Maincent, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com