On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 15:14:37 +0200 Kory Maincent wrote:
quoted
On Tue, 10 Jun 2025 10:11:41 +0200 Kory Maincent wrote:
quoted
+static bool
+pse_pi_is_admin_enable_not_applied(struct pse_controller_dev *pcdev,
+ int id)
the only caller of this function seems to negate the return value:
drivers/net/pse-pd/pse_core.c:369: if
(!pse_pi_is_admin_enable_not_applied(pcdev, i))
let's avoid the double negation ?
I thought it was better for comprehension.
If we inverse the behavior we would have a function name like that:
pse_pi_is_admin_disable_not_detected_or_applied()
Do you have a better proposition?
Would pse_pi_is_admin_enable_pending() work?