-----Original Message-----

On Fri, 13 Jun 2025 18:02:46 +0800, Joy Zou wrote:

quoted

The design of i.MX91 platform is very similar to i.MX93.
Extracts the common parts in order to reuse code.

The mainly difference between i.MX91 and i.MX93 is as follows:
- i.MX91 removed some clocks and modified the names of some clocks.
- i.MX91 only has one A core.
- i.MX91 has different pinmux.
- i.MX91 has updated to new temperature sensor same with i.MX95.

Joy Zou (8):
  dt-bindings: soc: imx-blk-ctrl: add i.MX91 blk-ctrl compatible
  arm64: dts: freescale: rename imx93.dtsi to imx91_93_common.dtsi
  arm64: dts: imx93: move i.MX93 specific part from

imx91_93_common.dtsi

quoted

    to imx93.dtsi
  arm64: dts: imx91: add i.MX91 dtsi support
  arm64: dts: freescale: add i.MX91 11x11 EVK basic support
  arm64: defconfig: enable i.MX91 pinctrl
  pmdomain: imx93-blk-ctrl: mask DSI and PXP PD domain register on
    i.MX91
  net: stmmac: imx: add i.MX91 support

Pengfei Li (1):
  dt-bindings: arm: fsl: add i.MX91 11x11 evk board

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml          |    6 +
 .../soc/imx/fsl,imx93-media-blk-ctrl.yaml     |   55 +-
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |    1 +
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dts    |  878 ++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-pinfunc.h |  770 +++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi      |  124 ++
 .../boot/dts/freescale/imx91_93_common.dtsi   | 1215 ++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93.dtsi      | 1412 ++---------------
 arch/arm64/configs/defconfig                  |    1 +
 .../net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwmac-imx.c   |    2 +
 drivers/pmdomain/imx/imx93-blk-ctrl.c         |   15 +
 11 files changed, 3166 insertions(+), 1313 deletions(-)  create mode
100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-pinfunc.h
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91.dtsi
 create mode 100644

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91_93_common.dtsi

quoted

--
2.37.1

My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.

Thanks for your reminder!
Have run DT checks and found this warning. The temperature bindings and driver patch v6 is reviewing.
So add note to the " [PATCH v5 5/9] arm64: dts: imx91: add i.MX91 dtsi support" patch.
Refer to the link: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-kernel/patch/20250407-imx91tmu-v6-0-e48c2aa3ae44@nxp.com/
BR
Joy Zou

Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings are
fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform maintainer whether
these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply unless the platform
maintainer has comments.

If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then make sure
dt-schema is up to date:

  pip3 install dtschema --upgrade


This patch series was applied (using b4) to base:
 Base: attempting to guess base-commit...
 Base: tags/v6.16-rc1-6-g8a22d9e79cf0 (best guess, 6/7 blobs matched)

If this is not the correct base, please add 'base-commit' tag (or use b4 which
does this automatically)

New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y for
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/' for
20250613100255.2131800-1-joy.zou@nxp.com:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx91-11x11-evk.dtb:
/soc@0/bus@44000000/thermal-sensor@44482000: failed to match any
schema with compatible: ['fsl,imx91-tmu']