Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] can: Add Nuvoton NCT6694 CANFD support
From: Ming Yu <hidden>
Date: 2025-02-12 02:49:55
Also in:
linux-can, linux-gpio, linux-hwmon, linux-i2c, linux-rtc, linux-usb, linux-watchdog, lkml
Dear Marc, Thank you for reviewing, Marc Kleine-Budde [off-list ref] 於 2025年2月7日 週五 下午8:15寫道:
quoted
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Nuvoton NCT6694 Socket CANfd driver based on USB interface. + * + * Copyright (C) 2024 Nuvoton Technology Corp. + *//* net-dev style multiline * comments look like this */
Okay, I will fix these comments in the next patch.
quoted
+ +#include <linux/can/dev.h> +#include <linux/can/rx-offload.h> +#include <linux/ethtool.h> +#include <linux/irqdomain.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/mfd/core.h> +#include <linux/mfd/nct6694.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/netdevice.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> + +#define DRVNAME "nct6694_canfd" + +/* + * USB command module type for NCT6694 CANfd controller. + * This defines the module type used for communication with the NCT6694 + * CANfd controller over the USB interface. + *//* net-dev style multiline * comments look like this */ or remove the comment altogether as it's stating the obvious :)
Okay, I will remove it in the next patch.
quoted
+#define NCT6694_CAN_MOD 0x05 + +/* Command 00h - CAN Setting and Initialization */ +#define NCT6694_CAN_SETTING 0x00 +#define NCT6694_CAN_SETTING_CTRL1_MON BIT(0) +#define NCT6694_CAN_SETTING_CTRL1_NISO BIT(1) +#define NCT6694_CAN_SETTING_CTRL1_LBCK BIT(2) + +/* Command 01h - CAN Information */ +#define NCT6694_CAN_INFORMATION 0x01 +#define NCT6694_CAN_INFORMATION_SEL 0x00 + +/* Command 02h - CAN Event */ +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT 0x02 +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_SEL(idx, mask) \ + ((idx ? 0x80 : 0x00) | ((mask) & 0x7F)) + +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_MASK GENMASK(5, 0) +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVT_TX_FIFO_EMPTY BIT(7) /* Read-clear */ +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_LOST BIT(5) /* Read-clear */ +#define NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_IN BIT(7) /* Read-clear*/ + +/* Command 10h - CAN Deliver */ +#define NCT6694_CAN_DELIVER 0x10 +#define NCT6694_CAN_DELIVER_SEL(buf_cnt) \ + ((buf_cnt) & 0xFF) + +/* Command 11h - CAN Receive */ +#define NCT6694_CAN_RECEIVE 0x11 +#define NCT6694_CAN_RECEIVE_SEL(idx, buf_cnt) \ + ((idx ? 0x80 : 0x00) | ((buf_cnt) & 0x7F)) + +#define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_TAG_CAN0 0xC0 +#define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_TAG_CAN1 0xC1in "include/linux/mfd/nct6694.h" it's CAN1 and CAN2, can you make it "0" based everywhere?
Understood. I will update these macros in the header.
what about making it: #define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_TAG_CAN(idx) (0xC0 | (idx))
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+#define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_EFF BIT(0) +#define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_RTR BIT(1) +#define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_FD BIT(2) +#define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_BRS BIT(3) +#define NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_ERR BIT(4) + +#define NCT6694_NAPI_WEIGHT 32 +
...
quoted
+struct nct6694_can_priv { + struct can_priv can; /* must be the first member */ + struct can_rx_offload offload; + struct net_device *ndev; + struct nct6694 *nct6694; + struct workqueue_struct *wq; + struct work_struct tx_work; + struct nct6694_can_frame tx; + struct nct6694_can_frame rx; + struct nct6694_can_event event[2]; + struct can_berr_counter bec; + unsigned char can_idx;can you use ndev->dev_port instead?
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+}; +
...
quoted
+static void nct6694_can_rx(struct net_device *ndev, u8 rx_evt) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + struct nct6694_can_frame *frame = &priv->rx; + struct nct6694_cmd_header cmd_hd = { + .mod = NCT6694_CAN_MOD, + .cmd = NCT6694_CAN_RECEIVE, + .sel = NCT6694_CAN_RECEIVE_SEL(priv->can_idx, 1), + .len = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(*frame)) + }; + struct sk_buff *skb; + int ret; + + ret = nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, &cmd_hd, frame); + if (ret) + return; + + if (frame->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_FD) { + struct canfd_frame *cfd; + + skb = alloc_canfd_skb(priv->ndev, &cfd); + if (!skb) + return; + + cfd->can_id = le32_to_cpu(frame->id); + cfd->len = canfd_sanitize_len(frame->length); + if (frame->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_EFF) + cfd->can_id |= CAN_EFF_FLAG; + if (frame->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_BRS) + cfd->flags |= CANFD_BRS; + if (frame->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_ERR) + cfd->flags |= CANFD_ESI; + + memcpy(cfd->data, frame->data, cfd->len); + } else { + struct can_frame *cf; + + skb = alloc_can_skb(priv->ndev, &cf); + if (!skb) + return; + + cf->can_id = le32_to_cpu(frame->id); + cf->len = min_t(u8, frame->length, CAN_MAX_DLEN);use can_cc_dlc2len()
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ if (frame->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_EFF) + cf->can_id |= CAN_EFF_FLAG; + + if (frame->flag & NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_RTR) + cf->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG; + else + memcpy(cf->data, frame->data, cf->len); + } + + nct6694_can_rx_offload(&priv->offload, skb); +} + +static int nct6694_can_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *ndev, + struct can_berr_counter *bec) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + + *bec = priv->bec; + + return 0; +} + +static void nct6694_can_handle_state_change(struct net_device *ndev, + enum can_state new_state) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + struct can_berr_counter bec; + struct can_frame *cf; + struct sk_buff *skb; + + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf); + + nct6694_can_get_berr_counter(ndev, &bec); + + switch (new_state) { + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE: + priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++;^^^^^^^^^^^^^quoted
+ priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE; + if (cf) + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_ACTIVE; + break; + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: + priv->can.can_stats.error_warning++; + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING; + if (cf) { + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL; + if (bec.txerr > bec.rxerr) + cf->data[1] = CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_WARNING; + else + cf->data[1] = CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_WARNING; + cf->data[6] = bec.txerr; + cf->data[7] = bec.rxerr; + } + break; + case CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE: + priv->can.can_stats.error_passive++; + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE; + if (cf) { + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_CRTL; + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_RX_PASSIVE; + if (bec.txerr >= CAN_ERROR_PASSIVE_THRESHOLD) + cf->data[1] |= CAN_ERR_CRTL_TX_PASSIVE; + cf->data[6] = bec.txerr; + cf->data[7] = bec.rxerr; + } + break; + case CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF: + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF; + priv->can.can_stats.bus_off++; + if (cf) + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_BUSOFF; + can_free_echo_skb(ndev, 0, NULL); + netif_stop_queue(ndev); + can_bus_off(ndev); + break; + default: + break; + } + + nct6694_can_rx_offload(&priv->offload, skb); +} + +static void nct6694_can_handle_state_errors(struct net_device *ndev, u8 status) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);It seems you don't have dedicated RX and TX states, so call nct6694_can_get_berr_counter() and use can_state_get_by_berr_counter() to get the states. Then basically do that what what mcp251xfd_handle_cerrif() does, starting with "new_state = max(tx_state, rx_state);"
Excuse me, do you mean that nct6694_can_handle_state_change() the flow should like v5? https://lore.kernel.org/linux-can/CAMZ6RqLHEoukxDfV33iDWXjM1baK922QnWSkOP01VzZ0S_9H8g@mail.gmail.com/ (local)
quoted
+ + if (status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_STS_ERROR_ACTIVE && + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE) { + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered active state\n"); + nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev, CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE); + } + + if (status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_STS_WARNING && + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING) { + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered warning state\n"); + nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev, CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING); + } + + if (status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_STS_ERROR_PASSIVE && + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) { + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered passive state\n"); + nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev, CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE); + } + + if (status == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_STS_BUS_OFF && + priv->can.state != CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF) { + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Error, entered bus-off state\n"); + nct6694_can_handle_state_change(ndev, CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF); + } +} + +static void nct6694_can_handle_bus_err(struct net_device *ndev, u8 bus_err) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + struct can_frame *cf; + struct sk_buff *skb; + + if (bus_err == NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERR_NO_ERROR) + return; + + priv->can.can_stats.bus_error++; + + skb = alloc_can_err_skb(ndev, &cf); + if (skb) + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_PROT | CAN_ERR_BUSERROR; + + switch (bus_err) { + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERR_CRC_ERROR: + netdev_dbg(ndev, "CRC error\n"); + ndev->stats.rx_errors++; + if (skb) + cf->data[3] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_LOC_CRC_SEQ; + break; + + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERR_STUFF_ERROR: + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Stuff error\n"); + ndev->stats.rx_errors++; + if (skb) + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_STUFF; + break; + + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERR_ACK_ERROR: + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Ack error\n"); + ndev->stats.tx_errors++; + if (skb) { + cf->can_id |= CAN_ERR_ACK; + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_TX; + } + break; + + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERR_FORM_ERROR: + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Form error\n"); + ndev->stats.rx_errors++; + if (skb) + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_FORM; + break; + + case NCT6694_CAN_EVT_ERR_BIT_ERROR: + netdev_dbg(ndev, "Bit error\n"); + ndev->stats.tx_errors++; + if (skb) + cf->data[2] |= CAN_ERR_PROT_TX | CAN_ERR_PROT_BIT; + break; + + default: + break; + } +missing check: if (skb)
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ nct6694_can_rx_offload(&priv->offload, skb); +} + +static void nct6694_can_tx_irq(struct net_device *ndev) +{ + struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats; + + stats->tx_bytes += can_get_echo_skb(ndev, 0, NULL);use can_rx_offload_get_echo_skb_queue_tail() here
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ stats->tx_packets++; + netif_wake_queue(ndev); +} + +static irqreturn_t nct6694_can_irq(int irq, void *data) +{ + struct net_device *ndev = data; + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + struct nct6694_can_event *evt = priv->event; + struct nct6694_cmd_header cmd_hd = { + .mod = NCT6694_CAN_MOD, + .cmd = NCT6694_CAN_EVENT, + .sel = NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_SEL(priv->can_idx, NCT6694_CAN_EVENT_MASK), + .len = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(priv->event)) + }; + irqreturn_t handled = IRQ_NONE; + int can_idx = priv->can_idx; + int ret;it would make sense to have a event pointer here instead of the can_idx? const struct nct6694_can_event *event = &priv->event[priv->can_idx];
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ + ret = nct6694_read_msg(priv->nct6694, &cmd_hd, evt); + if (ret < 0) + return handled; + + if (priv->event[can_idx].rx_evt & NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_IN) { + nct6694_can_rx(ndev, priv->event[can_idx].rx_evt); + handled = IRQ_HANDLED; + } + + if (priv->event[can_idx].rx_evt & NCT6694_CAN_EVT_RX_DATA_LOST) { + nct6694_can_handle_lost_msg(ndev); + handled = IRQ_HANDLED; + } + + if (priv->event[can_idx].status) { + nct6694_can_handle_state_errors(ndev, priv->event[can_idx].status); + handled = IRQ_HANDLED; + } + + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING) { + nct6694_can_handle_bus_err(ndev, priv->event[can_idx].err); + handled = IRQ_HANDLED; + } + + if (handled) + can_rx_offload_threaded_irq_finish(&priv->offload); + + if (priv->event[can_idx].tx_evt & NCT6694_CAN_EVT_TX_FIFO_EMPTY) + nct6694_can_tx_irq(ndev);Move this in front of the handled check and add "handled = IRQ_HANDLED;" to the if-block.
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ + priv->bec.rxerr = priv->event[can_idx].rec; + priv->bec.txerr = priv->event[can_idx].tec; + + return handled; +} + +static void nct6694_can_tx_work(struct work_struct *work) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = container_of(work, + struct nct6694_can_priv, + tx_work); + struct nct6694_can_frame *frame = &priv->tx; + struct net_device *ndev = priv->ndev; + struct net_device_stats *stats = &ndev->stats; + struct sk_buff *skb = priv->can.echo_skb[0]; + static const struct nct6694_cmd_header cmd_hd = { + .mod = NCT6694_CAN_MOD, + .cmd = NCT6694_CAN_DELIVER, + .sel = NCT6694_CAN_DELIVER_SEL(1), + .len = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(*frame)) + }; + u32 txid; + int err; + + memset(frame, 0, sizeof(*frame)); + + if (priv->can_idx == 0) + frame->tag = NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_TAG_CAN0; + else + frame->tag = NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_TAG_CAN1;frame->tag = NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_TAG_CAN(priv->can_idx);
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ + if (can_is_canfd_skb(skb)) { + struct canfd_frame *cfd = (struct canfd_frame *)skb->data; + + if (cfd->flags & CANFD_BRS) + frame->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_BRS; + + if (cfd->can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG) { + txid = cfd->can_id & CAN_EFF_MASK; + frame->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_EFF; + } else { + txid = cfd->can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK; + } + frame->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_FD; + frame->id = cpu_to_le32(txid); + frame->length = cfd->len; + + memcpy(frame->data, cfd->data, cfd->len); + } else { + struct can_frame *cf = (struct can_frame *)skb->data; + + if (cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_FLAG) { + txid = cf->can_id & CAN_EFF_MASK; + frame->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_EFF; + } else { + txid = cf->can_id & CAN_SFF_MASK; + } + + if (cf->can_id & CAN_RTR_FLAG) + frame->flag |= NCT6694_CAN_FRAME_FLAG_RTR; + else + memcpy(frame->data, cf->data, cf->len); + + frame->id = cpu_to_le32(txid); + frame->length = cf->len; + } + + err = nct6694_write_msg(priv->nct6694, &cmd_hd, frame); + if (err) { + netdev_err(ndev, "%s: TX FIFO is full!\n", __func__); + can_free_echo_skb(ndev, 0, NULL); + stats->tx_dropped++; + stats->tx_errors++; + netif_wake_queue(ndev); + } +} + +static netdev_tx_t nct6694_can_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, + struct net_device *ndev) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + + if (can_dev_dropped_skb(ndev, skb)) + return NETDEV_TX_OK; + + netif_stop_queue(ndev); + can_put_echo_skb(skb, ndev, 0, 0); + queue_work(priv->wq, &priv->tx_work); + + return NETDEV_TX_OK; +} + +static int nct6694_can_start(struct net_device *ndev) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + struct nct6694_can_setting *setting; + struct nct6694_cmd_header cmd_hd = { + .mod = NCT6694_CAN_MOD, + .cmd = NCT6694_CAN_SETTING, + .sel = priv->can_idx, + .len = cpu_to_le16(sizeof(*setting)) + }; + const struct can_bittiming *n_bt = &priv->can.bittiming; + const struct can_bittiming *d_bt = &priv->can.data_bittiming;nitpick: move these 2 right after priv and d_bt first.
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ int ret; + + setting = kzalloc(sizeof(*setting), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!setting) + return -ENOMEM; + + setting->nbr = cpu_to_le32(n_bt->bitrate); + setting->dbr = cpu_to_le32(d_bt->bitrate); + + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY) + setting->ctrl1 |= cpu_to_le16(NCT6694_CAN_SETTING_CTRL1_MON); + + if ((priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD) && + priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO)We should move this check into the infrastructure. Please only check for CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO.
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ setting->ctrl1 |= cpu_to_le16(NCT6694_CAN_SETTING_CTRL1_NISO); + + if (priv->can.ctrlmode & CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK) + setting->ctrl1 |= cpu_to_le16(NCT6694_CAN_SETTING_CTRL1_LBCK); + + ret = nct6694_write_msg(priv->nct6694, &cmd_hd, setting); + if (ret) + goto exit; + + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE; + +exit: + kfree(setting); + return ret; +} + +static int nct6694_can_stop(struct net_device *ndev) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = netdev_priv(ndev); +How does the device know, that it should leave the CAN bus? Is there a message you can send to it? If not put it at least into listen only mode.
My device only resets upon receiving the initial command, so can I assign priv->can.ctrlmode = CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY directly?
quoted
+ netif_stop_queue(ndev); + free_irq(ndev->irq, ndev); + destroy_workqueue(priv->wq); + priv->wq = NULL;no need to set wq to NULL
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED; + can_rx_offload_disable(&priv->offload);Please change move can_rx_offload_disable() in front of "priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED".
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ close_candev(ndev); + + return 0; +} + +static int nct6694_can_set_mode(struct net_device *ndev, enum can_mode mode) +{ + switch (mode) { + case CAN_MODE_START: + nct6694_can_start(ndev);please add error checking
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ netif_wake_queue(ndev); + return 0; + default: + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + } +} +
...
quoted
+static int nct6694_can_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + const struct mfd_cell *cell = mfd_get_cell(pdev); + struct nct6694 *nct6694 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent); + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv; + struct net_device *ndev; + int ret, irq, can_clk; + + irq = irq_create_mapping(nct6694->domain, + NCT6694_IRQ_CAN1 + cell->id); + if (!irq) + return irq; + + ndev = alloc_candev(sizeof(struct nct6694_can_priv), 1); + if (!ndev) + return -ENOMEM; + + ndev->irq = irq; + ndev->flags |= IFF_ECHO; + ndev->dev_port = cell->id; + ndev->netdev_ops = &nct6694_can_netdev_ops; + ndev->ethtool_ops = &nct6694_can_ethtool_ops; + + priv = netdev_priv(ndev); + priv->nct6694 = nct6694; + priv->ndev = ndev; + + can_clk = nct6694_can_get_clock(priv); + if (can_clk < 0) { + ret = dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, can_clk, + "Failed to get clock\n"); + goto free_candev; + } + + INIT_WORK(&priv->tx_work, nct6694_can_tx_work); + + priv->can_idx = cell->id; + priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;The device is allocated with CAN_STATE_STOPPED set, can be removed.
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ priv->can.clock.freq = can_clk; + priv->can.bittiming_const = &nct6694_can_bittiming_nominal_const; + priv->can.data_bittiming_const = &nct6694_can_bittiming_data_const; + priv->can.do_set_mode = nct6694_can_set_mode; + priv->can.do_get_berr_counter = nct6694_can_get_berr_counter; + + priv->can.ctrlmode = CAN_CTRLMODE_FD; + + priv->can.ctrlmode_supported = CAN_CTRLMODE_LOOPBACK | + CAN_CTRLMODE_LISTENONLY | + CAN_CTRLMODE_FD | + CAN_CTRLMODE_FD_NON_ISO | + CAN_CTRLMODE_BERR_REPORTING;nitpick: one space in front of "|" please Does your device run in CAN-FD mode all the time? If so, please use can_set_static_ctrlmode() to set it after priv->can.ctrlmode_supported and remove CAN_CTRLMODE_FD from ctrlmode_supported.
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ + ret = can_rx_offload_add_manual(ndev, &priv->offload, + NCT6694_NAPI_WEIGHT); + if (ret) { + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Failed to add rx_offload\n"); + goto free_candev; + } + + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, priv); + SET_NETDEV_DEV(priv->ndev, &pdev->dev); + + ret = register_candev(priv->ndev); + if (ret) + goto del_rx_offload; + + return 0; + +del_rx_offload:nitpick: please rename to rx_offload_del or can_rx_offload_del
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ can_rx_offload_del(&priv->offload); +free_candev: + free_candev(ndev); + return ret; +} + +static void nct6694_can_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) +{ + struct nct6694_can_priv *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); + + cancel_work_sync(&priv->tx_work);The workqueue has already been destroyed in nct6694_can_stop(), so more work should be pending.
Fix it in the v8.
quoted
+ unregister_candev(priv->ndev); + can_rx_offload_del(&priv->offload); + free_candev(priv->ndev); +} +
Best regards, Ming