Re: [PATCH v8 06/27] cxl: add function for type2 cxl regs setup
From: Alejandro Lucero Palau <hidden>
Date: 2024-12-27 08:04:28
Also in:
linux-cxl
On 12/24/24 17:22, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:10:21 +0000 alejandro.lucero-palau@amd.com wrote:quoted
From: Alejandro Lucero <redacted> Create a new function for a type2 device initialising cxl_dev_state struct regarding cxl regs setup and mapping. Signed-off-by: Alejandro Lucero <redacted> Reviewed-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Fan Ni <redacted>Comments below. Jquoted
--- drivers/cxl/core/pci.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/cxl/cxl.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+)diff --git a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c index 3cca3ae438cd..0b578ff14cc3 100644 --- a/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c +++ b/drivers/cxl/core/pci.c@@ -1096,6 +1096,53 @@ int cxl_pci_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, enum cxl_regloc_type type, } EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_pci_setup_regs, "CXL"); +static int cxl_pci_setup_memdev_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, + struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) +{ + struct cxl_register_map map; + int rc; + + rc = cxl_pci_setup_regs(pdev, CXL_REGLOC_RBI_MEMDEV, &map, + cxlds->capabilities); + /* + * This call returning a non-zero value is not considered an error sinceError code perhaps rather than non-zero value?
Makes sense.
quoted
+ * these regs are not mandatory for Type2. If they do exist then mapping + * them should not fail. + */ + if (rc) + return 0; + + return cxl_map_device_regs(&map, &cxlds->regs.device_regs); +} + +int cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds) +{ + int rc; + + rc = cxl_pci_setup_memdev_regs(pdev, cxlds); + if (rc) + return rc; + + rc = cxl_pci_setup_regs(pdev, CXL_REGLOC_RBI_COMPONENT, + &cxlds->reg_map, cxlds->capabilities); + if (rc) { + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "No component registers (%d)\n", rc); + return rc; + } + + if (!test_bit(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS, cxlds->capabilities))rc is 0. I doubt that's the intent - if it is, return 0;
Well, if the conditional is true, it is the end of the function, and we know there is no errors,so yes, return 0 will make it.
quoted
+ return rc; + + rc = cxl_map_component_regs(&cxlds->reg_map, + &cxlds->regs.component, + BIT(CXL_CM_CAP_CAP_ID_RAS)); + if (rc) + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map RAS capability.\n"); + + return rc; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs, "CXL");diff --git a/include/cxl/cxl.h b/include/cxl/cxl.h index 05f06bfd2c29..18fb01adcf19 100644 --- a/include/cxl/cxl.h +++ b/include/cxl/cxl.h@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ #define __CXL_H #include <linux/ioport.h> +#include <linux/pci.h>Use a forwards def if all you need is struct pci_dev;
I'll do. Thanks
quoted
enum cxl_resource { CXL_RES_DPA,@@ -40,4 +41,5 @@ int cxl_set_resource(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, struct resource res, bool cxl_pci_check_caps(struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds, unsigned long *expected_caps, unsigned long *current_caps); +int cxl_pci_accel_setup_regs(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct cxl_dev_state *cxlds); #endif